VOUCHERS NOT CHARTER SCHOOLS

VOUCHERS NOT CHARTER SCHOOLS

By Domenick J. Maglio PhD. Traditional Realist

When a parent visits a charter school often the facility looks like a start-up private school. The building is usually small and not the imposing modern public school building. It could be housed in a strip mall, converted house or office building. This is confusing enough for parents seeking an alternative to public school education but adding to this confusion charter schools often call themselves private/public schools. This purposeful mixed message is a branding technique to appeal to a broader audience. This private/public statement does not do anything to clarify the charter school’s actual status.

There is one feature that is a dead give-away that a charter school is not a private school. When examining the application of the school literature a family learns there is no tuition schedule included. This is not feasible for a private business. They have to charge tuition to pay for their expenses including teachers, facilities, taxes and to make it profitable enough to remain in business.

Charter schools have more flexibility than public schools but not as much as private schools. The curriculum of a charter school has more leeway in what they do in the classroom and more flexibility that can lead to innovation in the curriculum to teach more effectively.  The downside is their less transparency and accountability, which leads to possible shady practices, mismanagement and possible closure of the charter school. The employment compensation package is not as extensive as those unionized teachers in the regular public schools.  This allows them more flexibility to allocate more funds to better meet the educational needs of the students. As any other public school, charter schools have a form of accountability to local or state education bureaucracy. They have to have a normative based national test to show the academic achievement of the students although they are exempt from many other bureaucratic benchmarks.

Private school owners have their own financial investment in the building, material and supplies. They have all the financial responsibility and risk in any costs associated with any business venture. They have “skin in the game” while charter school administrators do not. Since the parents have to dip into their income and savings private school parents have more motivation to know their child’s daily progress. They want to insure they are getting their money’s worth.  These parents expect instant responses to their inquiries and personal in-depth information concerning their child’s behavior, academic skills in all areas and character development. Private schools can only be successful by convincing the parents their students are receiving a quality education for the tuition they are paying. The private school owners in essence have as many bosses as they have parents of students, not just a distant school board or a foundation member that is sponsoring the charter school.

Private schools and homeschoolers receive no school tax money given by the state. The entire risk and cost falls on the shoulders of the owners and parents not on the public taxpayers. Besides, these parents of private and homeschooled students are still responsible for public school taxes on top of their child’s private school tuition and home school expenses. These parents present a great plus for the average taxpayer. The more children are in private and home school settings the less the taxpayer has to shell out for school taxes. It relieves public schools of vast numbers of students that are overwhelming the public schools.

A much more effective and fair system to improve education is to give tuition vouchers to all parents with children to determine the school of their choice rather than allowing only charter schools to receive public funding. This voucher could be used in public, charter, private or homeschool situations. Home school parents are sacrificing their time, energy and income to educate their children and should receive compensation for their dedication to their child’s education. The voucher system would increase the parents’ options to select the best school for the needs of their children.

The powerful political teacher’s union and other organizations that promote only public schools should not be allowed to influence what type of school options should receive funding. The education of our future leaders should be decided on what is good for students not on political considerations of winning the favor of a large block of “voters,” who only consider a “public school” education.

Instead let the citizens directly decide by giving them a voucher to vote with their own tax money to choose what is best for their children. Competition will improve all the educational venues through fair competition without strings attached.

Domenick Maglio, PhD. is a columnist carried by various newspapers, an author of several books and owner/director of Wider Horizons School, a college prep program. Dr. Maglio is an author of weekly newspaper articles, INVASION WITHIN and a new book entitled, IN CHARGE PARENTING- In a PC World. You can see many of Dr. Maglio’s articles at www.drmaglioblogspot.com.