SUPPRESSING SPANKING HAS INCREASED DISABILITIES
SUPPRESSING SPANKING HAS
INCREASED DISABILITIES
by Domenick J. Maglio PhD
Traditional Realist
Every year we are inundated with
the latest fad childhood disorder. The hits of the year have become
recognizable to even the average person who is far removed from the mental
health field. ADHD, Autism, Conduct Disorder, Asperger’s and Learning Disorders
are just some of the mental disorder hit parade. Bipolar has become a popular
diagnosis today for children although not long ago it was considered an
inappropriate diagnosis for children due to their normal mood swings. It is not
unusual for a child to go from crying to laughing in a moment.
The reason for the epidemic
increase in the labeling of children has been blamed on everything imaginable.
Some of these are food coloring, chemical imbalance, diet, preservatives in
vaccinations, allergies, viruses, power lines, use of electronics, chemicals in
the water, and a host of other theories, which have captured some enthusiastic
followers.
The most obvious reason for the
phenomenal increase in childhood disabilities is taboo in most public
discussions: It is spanking. Modern parents no longer feel it acceptable to
spank a child for misbehavior.
In our politically correct
society, spanking has been equated with abuse and is considered by some
officials to be a criminal act. Spanking has not been officially declared
illegal by the federal government although the media and educational institutions
have indoctrinated people from youngsters to middle age adults that it is a horrific
act, which it is not.
Spanking, like appeasing,
medicating, ignoring, lecturing carried to an extreme can be abusive. In a more
moderate form spanking can be the best teaching strategy to assist a child in
remembering not to do a particular behavior.
Moderate spanking is not only, not
abusive, but is the most effective means of extinguishing a potentially harmful
behavior and obtaining an individual’s attention. When "stop" is
stated as a sharp command it often works. Listening to a parent’s command can
prevent a calamity. In the case where the child does not respond to the
command, a slap on the backside will get the child's immediate attention long
enough for him to stop the action.
Not only does moderate spanking
set limits, it will decrease impulsive behavior. An uninhibited child is often
a dangerous child to himself and others.
He does dangerous things before thinking of the consequences of his
actions. A spank is a consequence that imprints in the child’s mind that doing
a dangerous action will cause him pain.
Once the child realizes the
parent means business, the testing of limits becomes less attractive to the
child and normally the frequency declines. The toddler gains awareness of the
parent's presence and even eye contact can stop the child in his tracks. This
has historically been called “the evil eye” and has been a powerful tool in the
parent’s quiver for controlling the child’s behavior. The youngster has learned
to respond appropriately to the power of his parent’s presence.
Even when the parent is not
present, this training would influence the child’s behavior. A child with a
strong parental authority figure will have that parent's face flash in front of
his mind when contemplating a ridiculous action. The thought of the parent's
reaction before he acts is a natural and effective inhibitor of potential
reckless behavior.
The discouraging of spanking and
the encouraging of the child to think he is equal with the parent have been
destructive changes in establishing appropriate behavior. This weakening of
standards and expectations, which has left children vulnerable to be diagnosed
with some type of mental disorder. Ever since we have de-legitimized
traditional parenting beginning a half century ago, children do not listen as
well and have less respect for their weak, wanting-to-be-liked parents.
The duty of the parent has
radically shifted. It has transformed from a trainer of children who increases
his child's chance of survival to a playmate. The parent as an equal is supposed
to instantaneously provide everything the child wants to make him or her happy.
This has had a radical effect on our
children’s attitudes, thinking and behaving.
This transformation to a
permissive, materialistic "buddy" has been the number one reason for
the increase in childhood disabilities and emotional unhappiness. Children no
longer are being taught to appreciate the strength of their parents' guidance.
Parents have the experience to assist their child to navigate the difficulties
of life. Any unnecessary traumatic event can negatively alter the course of a
child’s mental and physical health. Growing up is dangerous enough but without
the parent’s establishing parameters it is a disaster waiting to happen.
In the long run appropriate
spanking is more humane than the abdication of the parental responsibility,
medicating a child into submission, and labeling a child with a disability that
follows him for the rest of his life.
Children that have parents who
care enough to say “no” and give an occasional spanking develop emotional
security. They have the discipline necessary to become self-reliant
individuals.
Dr. Maglio is an author and owner/director of Wider Horizons
School, a college prep program. You can visit Dr. Maglio at www.drmaglio.blogspot.com.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home