THERE ARE VERY FEW LIBERAL DEMOCRATS
THERE ARE VERY
FEW LIBERAL DEMOCRATS
By Domenick J.
Maglio Ph.D. Traditional Realist
Our founding
fathers were believers in classical liberalism that took place around the
enlightenment period. Adam Smith, Thomas Hobbs, and John Locke greatly influenced
the leaders of the American Revolution. Adam Smith’s ideas became the basis of
our capitalist economy. Limited government, the right to liberty and property,
rule of law, individual civil freedoms such as the right to freedom of speech,
religion and assembly and the right of citizens to bear arms against an
oppressive government were inspired by these philosophers.
Both evolving
early American political groups had a common allegiance to the philosophy of
classic liberalism. Jefferson advocated a weak central government along with
much of the power remaining with local states. The John Adams/ Alexander
Hamilton coalition pushed for a strong central government and limited state
powers. They argued fiercely with each other although both sides could compromise
on how to implement the policies as each group believed in liberal principles.
In the beginning
of the 20th century, Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson announced
they were progressive politicians. This meant their main objective was to
reform society and to advance progress for mankind. They attempted to do this
by government intervention using a top down approach. The focus shifted from
keeping America a free, prosperous country to reforming the world. Woodrow
Wilson’s League of Nations was to create peace and progress for all mankind.
In the early 21st
century Hillary Clinton started to refer to herself as a “progressive.”
Many other
democrat joined the bandwagon. The democrats rebranded themselves “progressive”
from the label, “liberals,” which had taken on a negative connotation.
“Progressive” is a more accurate description of the party at this time.
Establishment politicians of both parties are intellectual elites who believe
in bypassing the voice of the people to implement their objectives. These past
champions of individual liberties transformed their priorities into socialistic,
communist ones. They trumpet utopian, egalitarian ideas of social justice by
cultural/social engineering. “Free everything” included money to every citizen,
open borders and self-destructive apology tour foreign policy. Some of these
progressives, Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasia-Cortez, have had the courage
to openly advocate failed over-the-top socialistic concepts.
Democrat “gradual-change
strategy” toward a statist government clearly ended with Obama. There was
nothing incremental about the policies he enacted. He led by presidential fiat
through executive orders. The Obama administration bypassed the other two
branches of government. The progressive reforms came fast and furiously without
the consent of congress. The EPA, IRS, Justice Department, CIA, FBI, and ICE
wrote internal regulations that rapidly altered the way the USA operated. The
changes were only a temporary mirage that were unraveled as quickly as they
were implemented.
America was
being transformed into a statist, centrally controlled economy. They promoted
an upside-down culture by such means as multi-culturalism, non judgmentalism,
identity politics, hate crimes, political correctness and offensively
interfering with all debate. These changes were not done transparently but
clandestinely.
Currently after
the shock of President Trump winning the election the political elites in both
parties and the embedded unelected bureaucratic chiefs have openly attempted to
impeach the president. Anything and everything the president has done has been
criticized from every conceivable angle.
An alliance of progressive politicians with the media sources justify
and rationalize these attacks.
The progressives’
silence and tacit support of mob violence with destruction of property is
reminiscent of dictatorial takeovers. There is maybe an ounce of liberalism
left in the progressive democrat party. This is the reason law and order is not
maintained but undermined.
The reason
progressive democrats can ignore or support Antifa, Black Lives Matter,
anti-free speech university students, and other social change organizations who
use tactics of rioting, beating opponents, preventing debates, targeting people
in their private time, censoring free speech through hate speech is that are
not followers of liberalism. These radical groups members believe social ends
justify the means. Many progressive politicians have adopted the “Rules for
Radicals”.
The progressives
are a far cry from democrat Daniel Moynihan, Scoop Jackson, JFK and Harry
Truman who fought and understood the inherent evil of socialism/ communism. The
current and past standard excuses of why there has never been a positive
statist society is always the same. The advocates say that none of these
regimes had the right leader for it to work not that the utopian ideas are
unworkable. This leads to populist frustration and then repression.
The progressive
democrat party has demonstrated, by their unwillingness to accept and support a
duly elected President of the United States, that they do not believe in the
power of the people. The democrat party should not ever be called “liberal” as
they are now committed to “the ends justify the means” not a constitutional
republic of the people and for the people.
Domenick Maglio, PhD. is a columnist
carried by various newspapers, an author of several books and owner/director of
Wider Horizons School, a college prep program. Dr. Maglio is an author of
weekly newspaper articles, INVASION WITHIN and a new just published
book, entitled, IN CHARGE PARENTING In a PC World. You can visit Dr.
Maglio at www.drmaglio.blogspot.com.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home