An Immodest Proposal
AN
IMMODEST PROPOSAL: GOVERNMENT SHOULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR US ALL
By
Domenick J. Maglio PhD. Traditional Realist
Jonathan
Swift, in 1729 was too limited in his “Modest Proposal.” He wrote his satirical
essay to increase the public’s awareness of the plight of poor Irish children
to promote the need for government intervention. His shocking method was to facetiously
recommend that these burdensome children could be eaten, which would end the
issue and provide an additional food source for the country.
Our
government should have a grander goal of not only providing for children but
for all citizens and non citizens. The Obama healthcare program is the perfect
vehicle to open one’s eyes to the importance of government in protecting all of
us. We have learned that most of us need direction to make good choices for the
common good. One person living a self-destructive lifestyle is a burden to all.
By government benevolently micromanaging our lives, we can all prosper.
Mayor
Bloomberg has become the modern “Gunsmoke” sheriff bringing health and
stability to 8 million people through the force of his bureaucratic pen. He is
so concerned about the health of his citizens in New York City, he is mandating
regulations that will end obesity and lung cancer. He has single handedly
restricted the use of salt, popcorn, the size of fountain drinks, forced
restaurants to list calories of the dishes on the menu, eliminated saturated
fats and outlawed smoking while legalizing marijuana usage in public. The bureaucratic
controlling of individual’s harmful choices will promote a healthier existence
for each person and the entire society.
Individual
freedom has been a curse to man’s march to perfection. The freedom of the individual that allows stupid people to live
stupid lives can no longer be
tolerated. We have access to cutting edge scientific knowledge that
intellectual elites such as President Obama and Mayor Bloomberg can analyze to
make decrees for the uninformed public. They should be applauded, not condemned
for usurping liberties to micromanage our lives.
Our
government has the ability to insure a successful future for each and every
person. The collective good overrides the concept of individual rights.
Protecting us from ourselves is the only way government can obtain a better new
world.
Government
mandates relieve people of annoying, everyday decisions. Bureaucrats will determine
scientifically the proper foods to eat, the safest and least expensive cars to
drive, the amount of exercise, electricity used, type of houses to occupy,
programs to watch, books to read, healthy liquor to drink, tension free
vacations, best recreational drugs and type of healthcare and best death
protocol for each category in which a person falls.
Every
want and need will be provided by government programs. They will be managed by bureaucrats
who will nudge and direct us to a hassle-free existence that will maximize the
benefit to others. This daily directed life style will relieve us of the
personal responsibility of making choices. This eliminates any anxiety or
ambition to better oneself, for striving, thinking and judging would be
unnecessary and punished in a bureaucratically controlled society.
The
more freedom and independent thought citizens possess, the more difficulty
government has in controlling outcomes. Citizens running amuck doing their own
thing makes it virtually impossible for central planners to govern. Citizens, like children, have to be told what
and how to do things for there to be manageable and equitable progress.
Citizens
will no longer have to agonize over what is the best product to buy. A
government controlled economy will stop producing gadgets of convenience for
more essential items. There will be one or a few of the same types of products offered
in the marketplace. There will be no motivation for the entrepreneurial spirit
to exist. Decisions will not be made by catching the imagination of the masses
but by political bureaucrat committees who will be guided by impressing their
superiors and political considerations.
America
can no longer leave its future to selfish, greedy businessmen who are motivated
by profit. In a free market society millionaires and billionaires may strike it
rich. These “gifted” people may be more talented and able than others but they
do not deserve to be given a greater reward than the least able or motivated worker.
Instead
society needs to celebrate these bureaucratic experts who are driven by the
social welfare of others. These public servants need to respond to the dictates
of the man in charge, the president. Only with his steady hand on all the
levers of power and restricting individual freedom can our nation fulfill the
promise of being responsible for the personal lives of all citizens. The sacrificing of certain types of individual
habits and even human lives for the sake of the majority will allow our
government to make a seamless transition into a better future while using our
resources to the fullest extent. The president’s personal involvement in the
transformation of our concept of freedom should make all Americans sleep well.
People
who do not comply with regulations or politically correct behavior and thinking
are reconditioned in reeducation centers. There will be no justice but only
mercy for those who yield to the power of the government. Those who refuse to
conform have to be isolated. Only belligerent and political activists have to
be exterminated. Everyone, even the most able, will be expected to subordinate
his will to the dictates of the government. Everyone and everything belongs to
the state. Any group that threatens the nation will be repressed by military
might.
This
is an immodest proposal for overwhelming government intrusion into the lives of
the citizens in order to benefit a more powerful government ruling class.
“Democracy extends the
sphere of individual freedom, socialism restricts it. Democracy attaches all
possible value to each man; socialism makes each man a mere agent, a mere
number. Democracy and socialism have nothing in common but one word: equality.
But notice the difference: while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism
seeks equality in restraint and servitude.”
― Alexis de Tocqueville
― Alexis de Tocqueville