Articles are available for reprint as long as the author is acknowledged: Domenick J. Maglio Ph.D.

Tuesday, June 26, 2018

MOTHERLY HOUSE FATHERS NOT DOING THEIR JOB


MOTHERLY HOUSE FATHERS NOT DOING THEIR JOB
By Domenick J. Maglio Ph.D. Traditional Realist


Since the 1960s Sexual Revolution the stereotypical behavior of men and women began to merge and shift. The Feminist Movement encouraged girls and women to be more assertive, aggressive and directly competitive with men in what was the masculine domain of sports, higher education and business. These progressive elites have used federal laws like Title IX to give females unfair advantage in these areas.

The progressive strategies have effectively changed traditional male behavior.
Boys and men are more sensitive, display crying in public, have more delicate speech patterns in tone and meaning. The new males are less confrontational, less direct in their conversation while being willing to say what the other person wants to hear rather than what they truly feel and believe. Men have become socially more conniving, subtle and more tentative in their interactions with others especially females. Natural masculine behavior has been branded as obscene.

The feminist movement has manipulated political pressure in universities and the media to reverse these traditional natural roles. Currently many male students are required by women’s study programs to “detox their masculinity” meaning they have to prevent themselves from acting like a male. These efforts have born immense changes of many cultural aspects in America. The social engineering of gender behavior has been a frightening success with unintended consequences of a large number of people becoming gender confused.

Increasingly modern men have opted to take the role of “house husband” and opted out of taking the role of being the primary provider. This role for men had been very rare. Historically the males primarily were the hunters, gathers and protectors while the females were in charge of child rearing, preparing the food and maintaining the homestead. This division of labor was a direct result of the physical, psychological and emotional differences of the genders. Women gave birth, nursed their offspring, nurtured and taught cultural norms while the male’s strength and aggressiveness were more suited for going into the wilderness to provide food and protect the settlement.

Too many fathers have been saturated through television, magazines, and higher education courses to emulate and imitate female child rearing techniques and strategies. Receiving adulation, affection and favors from many progressive females and males have reinforced this new feminist/male lifestyle.

Many of our institutions have propagandized these men to be friends with their children instead of disciplinarians who teach their offspring by moral value lessons to prepare them for their future. The modern father should be empathetic with his children to be their BFF. This approach is even more detrimental when the father has total control of the child as the primary stay-at-home parent.

The housefather usually attempts to role model his modern concept of the perfect mother’s behavior and even tops it. He is softer spoken, more understanding and protective of his “ litter” than most mothers. These artificial nurturing males not having the maternal instinct over compensate. The househusbands are becoming the caricature of the over smothering mother.

Children have a double dose of “loving” but little effort to toughen them up to be socially, emotionally and industriously prepared for becoming competent and appropriate citizens. The problem for the children is they are ill prepared for the outside world. Due to the lack of training, these children often do not meet the standards and expectations of society including school. Many of these children have to be retained in a grade not because of intelligence but rather to help them develop basic academic skills, social abilities, and proper behavior that are not being taught by the home father but used to be taught by the mother. The children are the victims of the child development switch of the rules of parenting.

As always the pathetic lack of competent parenting is not blamed on the well-intended/ineffective housefather, but on the child. These mishandled youngsters have to suffer an incompetent father who poorly imitates a mother. The youngsters, not the modern fathers, are diagnosed with numerous mental health disorders.

Sperm donors who were never fathers, absentee fathers and now home motherly fathers are not role modeling their traditional role.  Strong, and at times dominant, male figures that instill the fear of God in their child are becoming almost non-existent. These were important people in a child’s life. Their word was never in doubt as they did what they said they would do. These manly, aggressive individuals certainly were never friends but were respected for their resolve and keeping their word.

These fathers were the force that kept many children on the straight and narrow. Without strong men in the family the statistics clearly show the male child is apt to be less functional and more likely to have behavioral issues.

Motherly fathers cannot replace traditional manly fathers. The children need the nurturing of the mother and the laying down the law and enforcing it by the father. The natural and instinctual reaction of both have from time immemorial existed. Both these types of approaches are as needed today as in the past to raise a healthy child.


Domenick Maglio, PhD. is a columnist carried by various newspapers, an author of several books and owner/director of Wider Horizons School, a college prep program. Dr. Maglio is an author of weekly newspaper articles, INVASION WITHIN and a new just published book, entitled, IN CHARGE PARENTING In a PC World. You can visit Dr. Maglio at www.drmaglio.blogspot.com.
























Tuesday, June 05, 2018

PROGRESSIVE PLAYBOOK IS MAFIA STYLE RACKETEERING


PROGRESSIVE PLAYBOOK IS MAFIA STYLE RACKETEERING
By Domenick J. Maglio PhD. Traditional Realist


The First Amendment to our Constitution protects our right to freedom of speech. This has been a hallmark of the USA since its inception. The progressive movement is insidiously attacking it. Unlike the traditional liberals who believed in debating ideas to reach logical and rational decisions, the progressives rely on the ends justifying the means to intimidate and eliminate the other side any way necessary. The goal is for their elite cohorts to gain total control of virtually everything.  Accomplishing this objective they have concluded that free speech has to be replaced by politically correct, “group think.”

We have clearly seen this process on college campuses. Any student or speaker who has non-progressive views is shouted down, humiliated or physically attacked.  Professors holding traditional viewpoints in universities on average are less than 10% of all professors. These few traditionalists understand the precarious position and self-censoring needed to keep their positions.

Our politically correct media are progressive advocates who create false narratives to push their elite agenda. The selection and perspective taken are always highlighted to demonstrate the positives of the progressive proponents and negatives of everyone else. The traditional side is labeled as racist, intolerant, mean spirited, and regressive or other pejorative statements to destroy their credibility and personal character.  Their personal life is investigated and exposed to eliminate them from the stage.

Media bias is part of the progressive strategy.  Publix, a large supermarket corporation, had the audacity to give money to Adam Putnam, a candidate for governor who supports the NRA. Even though Publix announced it would suspend political contributions the media still featured a “Die-In” protest in Publix. This was produced and directed by the progressive darling, David Hogg, and supporters of Parkland school shooting fame. The inclusion of this “Die in” after Publix’s capitulation was to solidify Hogg’s credentials, additionally it was a statement or warning to other corporations to follow the group-think script or else.

Roseanne Barr, a top money making television sitcom actress, was cancelled like lightning after her stupid Tweet about an Obama administration advisor. This incident clearly demonstrated the media’s double standard.  When many others: Joy Behar of “The View said “Christianity is like a mental illness,” Kathy Griffith held a “severed head of Trump”, Madonna spoke of wanting to blow up the Whitehouse, and many others made slanderous statements about President Trump none suffered any repercussions.

The hit men to keep everyone in line are political “media dons.” Reverend Jesse Jackson shook down corporations to donate to the Rainbow Coalition or they would be attacked as racist. Lois Lerner, Internal Revenue Service, refused to grant non-profit status to any pro Tea Party organization eliminating groups countering Obama and investigated donors who supported them. Eric Holder, head of the justice department, pursued corporations with the full force of the law. The business would be found guilty of an obscure ruling and would be forced to pay a fine that would go to promote a progressive cause. Now the corporations, like the small, local shops of the past, pay protection money and rationalize it as the cost of doing business.

Proposition 8- Defense of Marriage proposal in California 2008, stated that “only marriage between a man and a woman is valid.” After the voters approved the proposal the progressives staged a massacre of all supporters of Proposition 8. They published the names of anyone who gave money to help pass the law. These donors were personally and viciously attacked and many lost their positions. The state of Utah was boycotted, websites sprung up to make emotional appeals for voters to alter their vote. Churches who were pro Proposition 8 were labeled as homophiles. This scorched earth racketeering policy shut down enough voting supporters of the vote to reverse the results of Proposition 8.

The progressive strategy is to intimidate anyone who is considered a potential rival by making an offer they cannot refuse. Anyone who challenges progressive ideology will be personally targeted and annihilated. When a person surrenders and plays ball they are protected and can become clandestine members of the “ruling gang.” Paying up by supporting and saying the right things is simply extortion to stay in business.

The blatant racketeering of the progressive movement should be an insult to every freedom-loving citizen of the United States. These “banana republic” tactics are meant to frighten us to self-censor our First Amendment rights. Instead, Americans have to do their duty to listen and forcefully voice their opinions.

Citizens need to stand up and utilize our Freedom of Speech even if it means sacrificing our power and money to illustrate these brutal uses of power. Only fearless patriots can salvage our exceptional republic from these Deep State Mafia style thugs.



Domenick Maglio, PhD. is a columnist carried by various newspapers, an author of several books and owner/director of Wider Horizons School, a college prep program. Dr. Maglio is an author of weekly newspaper articles, INVASION WITHIN  and a recently published book, entitled, IN CHARGE PARENTING In a PC World. You can visit Dr. Maglio at www.drmaglio.blogspot.com